Gov. Rick Perry Signs Pledge Supporting a Federal Marriage Amendment

Gov. Rick Perry has signed a pledge to support a Federal Constitutional Amendment that would define marriage as being the union of a man and a woman. Perry has been falsely quoted as supporting New York’s move to legalize gay marriage recently. In actuality, Perry only said that New York, as a sovereign state, has the right to pass their own laws. But Perry’s position is also that on a matter such as marriage, the states have the right to collectively ratify a Federal Constitutional Amendment (it takes 3/4 of the states) to uphold the importance of traditional marriage as the basic institution of society:

REUTERS: Texas Governor and Republican presidential contender Rick Perry has signed a pledge vowing to support a Constitutional amendment declaring marriage to be a union of one man and one woman, the group sponsoring the pledge said on Friday.

“Kudos to Governor Rick Perry for making it clear: he’s a marriage champion,” National Organization for Marriage president Brian Brown said in a statement.

By signing the pledge, “Perry makes crystal clear that, contrary to the conventional wisdom, gay marriage is going to be even a bigger issue in 2012 than it was in 2008,” Brown said, “because the difference between the GOP nominee and President (Barack) Obama is going to be large and clear.”

The pledge also includes a vow to support the Defense of Marriage Act in court, appoint judges and an Attorney General who will respect “the original meaning of the Constitution,” and appoint a presidential commission to investigate harassment of “traditional marriage” supporters. . . . Read More

  • just an average voter

    I support gay marriage, however I do not support the Federal govt coming into any state that decides one way or another on this matter. I supported NY’s new law, just as I would respect (not agree) with a law in UT that defined marriage in the traditional sense.

    And I like that Rick Perry is a big state’s right person, and in fact that is what the founding fathers of the Constitution had in mind, if there is enough movement in something, then the constitution itself needs to be changed, but states rights are states rights.  And while I’m not pro-life, I do think that’s how abortion should have been handled, rather than cramming it down on everyone.

    I like this stance by Rick Perry, and I’ll continue to support him.

  • Anonymous

    Yes, it still leaves it in the hands of the states. It is a very high bar to cross to get 3/4 of the states to ratify an amendment.

  • Katielee4211

    Thank-you. I’m with you. Although I would like to see gay’s have the right to marry across the board. But it is the decision of the State and their citizens.  I don’t think a Federal marriage amendment is appropriate. 

  • Brad

    Homosexuals have the right to marry in any state.  What they do not have is the right to redefine what marriage is or what is best and most stable for children.  It is intellectually dishonest to treat this as a rights issue even if millions are being intellectually dishonest. One of the most fundamental things a civil society can do is tell the truth and be truthful. 


Support the Wounded Warrior Project

Poll of the Week


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Follow Us


on twitteron facebookby RSS feed