Far-Left Patron George Soros: “If it’s between Obama and Romney, there isn’t All that Much Difference” – Video 1/29/12

Oh my. Just what the Romney Team wants on the eve of the Florida Primary.

Here is video of far-Left patron George Soros saying in an interview that there “isn’t all that much difference” between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney. But, “Gingrich or Santorum,” he said, “would make a big difference.”

The Gingrich Team had better be getting this up in ads immediately.

NOTE: Gingrich is already using this quote.

Posted by Brian on Monday, January 30th, 2012   |   5 Comments »
Tags: , ,
  • Anonymous

    I hardly think Republicans of any stripe listen to Soros for advice, and his claim is absurd. You could, however, say he might have an ulterior motive for saying this.  It’s too late to make a difference in FL though, even if someone listens to him.

  • http://www.allamericanblogger.com/ Duane Lester

    I find it hard to believe that Soros would attempt to influence the Republican primary by doing an interview on Davos Today, unless this is from Davo, Florida, not Davos, Switzerland.

    Great find on the video, by the way.

  • Brad

    Wow.  First time I agreed with Soros.  Although it’s a bit of exaggeration.  Obama is in a category all by himself.  But Romney would not un-do Obamaism and we desparately need an undo. 

  • Bubstr

    Unsubstantiated claims are easily dismissed with out proof. Do you have proof that Ron Paul stated a property owner could refuse service to a minority? Property rights have been infringed. Take your coal mine as an example. As it is now Regulations make it very hard to exercise your property rights to mine coal, whether you was going to do it with out infringing on others rights or not. When is one infringement more important than someone else’s rights? Take the Gulf oil spill for an example. One oil company spilled oil. A moratorium was put in place stopping all oil companies from doing business. The Federal government infringed on their property rights. B P who spilled the oil infringed on the Gulf states property owners by polluting their property. If the federal government didn’t step in and create an escrow account,that BP had to post 20B these property owners could have sued BP and actually made the villain pay. It may have put BP out of business, but it wouldn’t have punished innocent oil companies and the gulf property owners would have been paid just compensation for the infringement.   So does a slap on the hand deter farther infringements or would exercising property rights?

  • Bubstr

    Sound money, It is imperitive that some kind of backing be made for several reasons. First, when our government creates a spending bill, that money is created as debt. Since there is no backing, there is nothing to stop this.

    When you do this and create debt,you do tw things. you have to pay interest and the money not being backed creates inflation. Who pays the bill? Yes the taxpayer. They pay the interest threw income taxes and they pay the inflation by their money not buying as much the next year and the year after that. The government hides the true inflation figure fairly well, but anyone that shops for food, clothes or gasoline knows it is at least 5%. this is almost as much as you pay for your Social Security contributions, which, by the way, are just another tax,

    The question is, do you want to let your government tax you at will or do you want a backed currency? Congress can’t do it with out regulation of backed currency as we have seen since we went off the gold standard in the early 70s. Some are getting very wealthy from this way of doing business. Most of us are just paying the bill.


Support the Wounded Warrior Project

Poll of the Week


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Follow Us


on twitter   on facebook   by RSS feed

  • Blogroll