Donald Trump Plays Role of Mitt Romney Surrogate; Goes After Rick Santorum as Unelectable – Video 2/8/12

Last night on Greta Van Susteren’s show, “On the Record,” Donald Trump played the role of Mitt Romney surrogate and went after Rick Santorum, revealing what is likely to be a key line of attack against him – electability. Trump focused on Santorum’s loss in Pennsylvania as an incumbent U.S. Senator in 2006 – a terrible year for Republicans in general.

MEDIAITE: . . . “I have nothing against Rick Santorum, he seems like a nice guy,” Trump told Van Susteren, before noting that Santorum lost by 19 points– “a record in the Senate for the incumbent.” He then went on to compare Santorum to a “student who gets thrown out of high school for bad marks but then wants to go to the Wharton School of Finance,” a school Trump knows quite well. “He ran, he lost by a tremendous amount,” Trump continued, adding that he could see that Pennsylvania voters “obviously weren’t happy.”

Van Susteren tried to play the role of Santorum and respond that “in 2006, the year he was beaten by 19 point by Senator Casey, they lost 23 of 33 seats, but in Pennsylvania, five conservative districts” and the governorship. Trump accepted that that might be, but he did not seem convinced at all that this was a sufficient justification for his lose. “How do you lose like that?” He asked rhetorically, “maybe it’s time to get into a different business, be a lawyer.” His tone on the matter got increasingly aggressive, culminating in him saying “somebody beat him by tremendous numbers and all of the sudden he says he wants to be president? Give me a break!” Trump did conclude on a conciliatory note, however, allowing for the opportunity that “maybe, over the course of time, he would be a great candidate and a great president.” . . . Read More

Expect to hear a lot more of this from Mitt Romney and his supporters in the weeks ahead – “Rick’s a nice guy but he is not electable against Barack Obama.” I’ve raised the same concern in past months based on the size of Santorum’s loss in Pennsylvania in 2006. But Santorum is now sounding the themes of a national campaign. If he is the nominee, he won’t be running just in one state, or focused on the issues of one state alone, he will be running on those national themes. The mood of the nation is very different today than it was six years ago.

  • Anonymous

    I like Rick Santorum.  He’s my second choice though because I think Romney appeals to Independents more than Rick can do.  Mostly I just want Republicans to win the White House, so I guess I agree with the Donald on this but not because Pennsylvania gave Rick the boot, but because Independents will.

  • Brad

    Santorum can appeal to the Reagan Democrats and Independents because of his blue collar support, his respect of faith, his “real”-ness, and the fact that he sticks to his principles.  We have to stop having to move left to win as the left moves further left.  We have to move this thing right or we will have 2 liberal parties.  

  • Anonymous

    I don’t see Independents supporting Rick for the things you stated.  Those must be your own reasons.  

    The left does move further to the left, but check out how far the right has moved to the right!  Independents aren’t for either extreme.

  • Brad

    So let’s see if I have this right.  You want to go with the candidate that appeals to people that don’t like people that work with their hands, don’t respect faith, are not genunine, and do not stick to their principles.  I don’t want to go off the cliff with those people, sorry.  This country was built on those foundations and we will either return to them or the nation will ultimately fall over the leftist clift which is a state of mind completely enveloped in fictious fear.  Because of that fear we are all supposed to settle for the “less extreme” candidate which is actually the one living in reality.  That’s not freedom.   

  • Anonymous

    You’re saying Romney is the only one living in reality?  Okay.

    Your attacks on Romney aren’t based in fact.  When throwing out stones you should supply links or facts or anything to support them.  Santorum has been claiming (falsely) that Romney required Catholic hospitals to provide birth control measures. Watch CPAC today for the truth.  It’s interesting that people will believe lies so quickly about Romney without even trying to learn the truth.

  • http://unhindered.com/blog SecondJon

     ”…I think Romney appeals to Independents more than Rick can do.”

    That’s the winning strategy used for McCain and Bush Sr.’s re-election campaigns.

    Oh. That’s how the Right loses.

  • Brad

    I did not say anything about Romney above.  I was saying why someone such as Santorum is worthy of support.  But I will say that Romney does change his stripes quite often so I would classify his realness as less than Santorum’s.  


Support the Wounded Warrior Project

Poll of the Week


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Follow Us


on twitteron facebookby RSS feed