Here is video of Rep. Peter King describing the testimony of Gen. David Petraeus today before the House Intelligence Committee on the Benghazi Terrorist Attack. King said Petraeus indicated he believed from the start it was a terrorist attack, and that the CIA’s original talking points indicated that fact. However, the version of the talking points put out by the Obama White House and U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice were different, indicating that at some point along the way the references to it being a terrorist attack were edited out by someone. There was no indication who changed the talking points or why.
Petraeus says CIA “talking points” called Benghazi a terrorist attack, but other agencies edited that out. hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie…
— Brit Hume (@brithume) November 16, 2012
I don’t buy it…: This is what is not believable. Today General Petraeus is saying, per reports, that he always … bit.ly/SwP7Q5
— Greta Van Susteren (@gretawire) November 16, 2012
Petraeus’s testimony raises more questions wapo.st/Wf4geW
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) November 16, 2012
Petraeus tells Congress the #Benghazitalking points were altered from the CIA version. on.cnn.com/SxuDGE
— Adam Levine (@cnnadam) November 16, 2012
Rep. King: “[Petraeus] now clearly believes that it… was not spontaneous and it was clear terrorist involvement” wapo.st/ZXRYXu
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) November 16, 2012




